Voice
A call in the accountant’s voice
In development · pilot places for autumn 2026
Voice clones, deepfake video calls, AI-written invoices. Your people practise the one action that stops all three: stop, call back on a number you already had, report it.
€93 million
lost to phishing in Belgium in 2025
11,000
cases, thirty per cent more than the year before
3 seconds
of audio are enough to clone a voice
Belgian government and banking sector, figures for 2025 · federal police (voice cloning)
Three minutes, on the phone they already carry
No new device, no classroom, no login on a laptop. The drill arrives, it runs, it ends with one sentence — and leaves an attestation you can hand over.
The call arrives on the phone they already carry.
What reaches an employee today is no longer a misspelt email.
Video
A video meeting with a face they know
Invoice
An invoice with one changed line
We score the action, not the recognition
Vendors now say verification is the skill that matters. None of the dashboards we reviewed measures it.
The rule is one sentence
Stop. Call back on a number you already had. Report it. One rule per session, repeated after a week and after a month.
Reporting is never wrong
Reporting something that turns out to be genuine scores a point, not a reprimand. A false alarm costs nothing.
Act, do not detect
We never ask whether the face looks real. People cannot reliably tell a cloned voice from a real one. We ask what you do.
Four things we do differently
Belgian Dutch and Belgian French
We ship both: nl-BE and fr-BE, in the voices Belgium is actually phoned in. The Belgian incumbent has nl-BE but only France French. Among the vendors we surveyed, a French-speaking employee gets France French or nothing at all. A voice drill in the wrong accent is not a drill.
The channels it actually happens on
Voice, video call and invoice are the product, not an add-on. Not email only.
AI Act Article 50
Every synthetic clip is labelled, every document watermarked, every practice call states that no real call is made. The article has applied since 2 August 2026.
We publish whether it works
Vendors publish click rates. No one we surveyed publishes whether people stop and verify. We will measure that before and after the pilot and publish the result, including when it disappoints.
A price without a scoping call
Most vendors in this market quote only after a call. We price per organisation, in writing, before anything starts.
The app
One price per organisation
The drill itself: both languages, every channel, the attestation, and the works-council notice ready to hand over.
Indicative until the pilot settles it.
Ask about a pilotCustom
Priced per project
Your own scenarios and your own brand — a supplier your people actually recognise, on the systems you already run.
We scope it with you, in writing, before anything starts.
Ask about customNo per-seat surprises and no scoping call to find out. If the pilot shows the number is wrong, it changes and we say so.
The first question your works council will ask
A drill at work touches on monitoring employees. The answer should be ready before you start.
We store one outcome code and one timestamp per attempt. Not what anyone typed, not what anyone said, no mailbox, no attachments.
The results belong to the employee. The employer sees group figures, not who got what wrong.
You get a draft works-council notice, written with CAO 39 and CAO 81 in mind.
Finishing a series earns an attestation of participation. It is not a legally recognised certificate, and we write that on it.
Pilot places, autumn 2026
We are looking for a handful of Belgian organisations to run the first series and argue with us. Built in Antwerp by Elena Uvarova (ontwrpn).